Results from a major London-wide survey released.

#ParkPower, a four month-long initiative to explore public sentiment around London parks and crowdsource ideas for their future, today reveals its findings, alongside a portfolio of recommendations for futureproofing parks as vital parts of our city.

#ParkPower, a four month-long initiative to explore public sentiment around London parks and crowdsource ideas for their future, today reveals its findings, alongside a portfolio of recommendations for futureproofing parks as vital parts of our city.

The London Collective, partnering with technology and digital solutions leader Siemens, the City of London Corporation, international building consultancy DAR Group and build-to-rent neighbourhood operator Get Living, launches a report, titled #ParkPower – a Crowdsourced Vision for the Future of Our Green Spaces, with four key recommendation areas for those who own, manage and design urban parks:

  • Community cohesion: create spaces to enable joint creativity, incidental meeting, arts and music, and local identity-building
  • Protect and increase natural capital: support wildlife, improve biodiversity, rethink plant palettes, experiment with food growing
  • Improve accessibility, mobility and connectedness: start a green link network, reprioritise pedestrians and people with disabilities

In total, 3,500 responses gave a valuable picture of what people valued most and what should be prioritised in the future, particularly in relation to Covid-19’s dual challenges of social distancing and social connection.

The data highlights the value of parks as an escape from the stresses of daily life, with 28% of responses saying they valued the feeling of space and access to nature; 26% viewed their green spaces as being important for their health and wellbeing. Perhaps most surprising was the theme of ‘quiet’ – the second most important thing that people want in their parks of the future. Interestingly, there was ambivalence to connectivity in parks, with only 1% of responses asking for better provision. Instead, 10% of people called for technology that would improve the user experience and accessibility.

In total, 3,500 responses gave a valuable picture of what people valued most and what should be prioritised in the future, particularly in relation to Covid-19’s dual challenges of social distancing and social connection.

The data highlights the value of parks as an escape from the stresses of daily life, with 28% of responses saying they valued the feeling of space and access to nature; 26% viewed their green spaces as being important for their health and wellbeing. Perhaps most surprising was the theme of ‘quiet’ – the second most important thing that people want in their parks of the future. Interestingly, there was ambivalence to connectivity in parks, with only 1% of responses asking for better provision. Instead, 10% of people called for technology that would improve the user experience and accessibility.

The London Collective, partnering with technology and digital solutions leader Siemens, the City of London Corporation, international building consultancy DAR Group and build-to-rent neighbourhood operator Get Living, launches a report, titled #ParkPower – a Crowdsourced Vision for the Future of Our Green Spaces, with four key recommendation areas for those who own, manage and design urban parks:

  • Community cohesion: create spaces to enable joint creativity, incidental meeting, arts and music, and local identity-building
  • Protect and increase natural capital: support wildlife, improve biodiversity, rethink plant palettes, experiment with food growing
  • Improve accessibility, mobility and connectedness: start a green link network, reprioritise pedestrians and people with disabilities

At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident, similique sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollitia animi, id est laborum et dolorum fuga.